tui for headless ida https://git.sl0p.foo/ida-tui.git/atom/tests/test_search.py?h=main 2026-08-07T21:16:30Z 2026-08-07T21:16:30Z blasty blasty@local 2026-08-07T21:16:30Z urn:sha1:41b3710d5b6f9be24430fd55c46c83f9ae3b8d83 `/` only ever searched the lines of the view you were in. This adds the search you actually need on a binary: over the entire database, either through the rendered disassembly or through the image. * **text** matches the line as displayed, whitespace-normalised, so `call cs:` finds `call cs:getenv_ptr` (IDA's column padding is not something anyone types). Smartcase; `regex` available over RPC. * **bytes** is IDA's own `find_bytes`, so the pattern language people already know works unchanged: hex pairs, `?` wildcards for a whole byte or one nibble (`48 8? ?? 24`), quoted literals (`"Hello", 0`). Commas, no separators (`488B05C3`) and ragged spacing all normalise. **Which mode you meant is guessed, and the guess is biased on purpose.** `dead`, `add`, `cafe` and `ff` are valid hex AND ordinary things to search for, so a bare hex-looking word stays TEXT; nobody types `48 8b ?? c3` meaning prose. `hex:`/`text:` prefixes and F2 override it. The subtle case is a *typo* in a byte pattern. `48 zz c3` first fell through to a text search and reported "no match" — indistinguishable from "those bytes are not in this binary", which is the most misleading answer a search can give. Now any query whose tokens are all byte-sized is treated as bytes, and a bad token is refused BY NAME. IDA does the same thing quietly (find_bytes answers a malformed pattern with zero hits and no error), so the validation lives in Program.search, not just in the UI. Enter searches, then Enter opens the highlighted hit; the title says which it will do, because a database-wide scan is far too slow to run on every keystroke like the other palettes. Navigation goes to the item head — a byte match can start mid-instruction — and the status names the exact address. Also: the `find` RPC verb and `drive find`, which is the one an agent wants (`drive find '48 8b ?? c3'`). idatui/search.py holds the classification and is pure, so the whole question of "what did they mean" is tested offline: tests/test_search.py, 35 checks, 0.1s. Pilot scenario db_search covers the UI end to end. Full suite: 890 passed, 0 failed, 51.3s.