|
|
Kitty graphics were green in the suite and a real program still drew
nothing. libghostty-vt ships no image codec: built as a library it sets
its `sys.decode_png` hook to null, and a null hook rejects every `f=100`
transmission outright -- no image stored, so no placement exists, so the
re-emission layer this project is mostly *about* is never reached. The
program gets no error and no picture.
Raw RGB worked throughout, which is why it looked done: every test here
sent raw pixels, because that is what is easy to write in a test. It is
the same lesson the last kitty graphics bug taught -- write the test the
way a program actually behaves -- and a program with a picture on disk
has a PNG. Found because ida-tui's startup logo never appeared, and its
detection probe answers `OK` first, so it fails silently rather than
falling back to its block art.
PNG is the whole of the gap and cannot grow: the protocol has exactly
three formats (`f=24`, `f=32`, `f=100`), the first two are raw pixels
lib-vt already handles, and `decode_png` is the only codec hook it has.
Decoding only, never encoding.
The decoder is the stb_image lib-vt already vendors and we already
commit -- upstream compiles that same header with the same
`STBI_ONLY_PNG` for this same purpose, it is just not in the
`-Demit-lib-vt` build. So nothing new is pulled in; a file we already
ship is finally compiled. src/png.c is the hook, a header pre-check and
a copy: dimensions are read before decoding because the buffer we return
is allocated through lib-vt's limited allocator but stb's own working
allocation is plain malloc and answers to nothing.
Tests cover a PNG placed at the size it asked for (RGB and RGBA sources,
both normalised to RGBA), the client being handed `f=32` rather than the
png it was given, and a malformed png placing nothing without taking the
pane with it. They fail on the previous binary.
|